The Root Causes Of

BI / Analytics Projects Failures

Why BI / Analytics Projects Fail ?

Understanding why analytics projects fail is vital in a data-driven world where organizations invest significantly in resources

Until 2023, only 20% of analytic insights delivered business outcomes. (Gartner)

87% of data science projects never make it into production. (Venturebeat)

In 2016, Gartner estimated that 60% of big data projects failed. A year later, Gartner analyst Nick Heudecker‏ put the failure rate at 85%. (TechRepublic)

The failure rate of such projects is alarming

The Root Causes

Ambiguous Deliverables and Conflicting Interests

BI projects often lack clear, agreed-upon goals, leading to internal misalignment and poor outcomes. 

To address this, organizations must:

  1. Identify desired business outcomes
  2. Align with strategic objectives
  3. Define SMART deliverables 

Common misalignments include:

  1. Competing interests and internal politics
  2. Limited data sharing
  3. Disconnect between technical resources and business users
  4. Neglect of end-user needs

By addressing these factors, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with BI and analytics projects, ensuring their investments yield tangible results.

Lack of Actionable Insights

The primary objective of any business intelligence (BI) project is to generate actionable insights. These insights are crucial for informing strategic decisions and driving business outcomes effectively. Without actionable insights, data remains stagnant and fails to deliver tangible value to the organization.

As research indicates, only a small fraction of analytic insights actually translate into meaningful business outcomes, emphasizing the critical importance of focusing on actionable insights from the outset.

It’s imperative to ensure that insights are contextualized, easily understandable, and capable of guiding decision-making processes across all levels of the organization.

Without actionable insights, BI projects risk becoming futile endeavors, wasting valuable resources and failing to deliver the intended business value. Thus, making actionable insights the focal point of BI initiatives is crucial for achieving successful outcomes and driving organizational growth.

Lack of Leadership and Ownership

Effective leadership and ownership are pivotal for the success of business intelligence (BI) projects. Here are key areas to focus on:

  1. Clear Goals: Ensure alignment and sign-off on agreed-upon project goals and outcomes. 
  2. Roles and Responsibilities: Define roles using frameworks like RASIC (Responsible, Approve, Support, Inform, Consult) to clarify accountability. 
  3. Effective Governance: Establish accountability for timely and quality delivery, focusing on milestones rather than granular tasks. 
  4. Strong Leadership: Build internal support and momentum for the project’s vision and deliverables. 
  5. Communication: Foster open communication channels, provide feedback, and ensure stakeholders sign off on work results.

Executive sponsorship is crucial, ensuring continued availability of resources, alignment with business outcomes, removal of roadblocks, expedited delivery, and resolution of conflicts. Lack of executive sponsorship can hinder project success, leading to missed opportunities and wasted resources. Thus, securing executive sponsorship is essential for BI project success.

Absence of Agile Methodologies

Traditional waterfall project management often fails in business intelligence (BI) projects due to its rigid requirement definition at the outset. Agile BI, however, offers a flexible and iterative approach to address this challenge:

  1. Concept Phase: Collaborate with stakeholders to create a rough mock-up in interactive workshops, setting the foundation for the project’s first iteration.
  2. Inception: Design and develop an initial prototype dashboard based on customer feedback and real data.
  3. Construction Iterations: Engage stakeholders in hands-on testing, iterating through multiple cycles of testing, reviewing, and building until the minimum viable product (MVP) is achieved.
  4. Transition to Production: Release the MVP to test users with proper training and support, preparing for full production deployment.
  5. Production Phase: Implement a feedback mechanism for continuous improvement, emphasizing progress over perfection.

By prioritizing high-impact deliverables and embracing an agile approach, BI projects can adapt to evolving requirements and deliver value incrementally. 

Poor Data Quality & Integration

In the realm of data analytics, the principle “Garbage In, Garbage Out” remains pertinent.

Incomplete or inaccurate data compromises the integrity of insights generated, rendering dashboards ineffective.

An illustrative example lies in marketing segmentation analytics and personalized email communications.

Despite significant investment in Pardot, a cutting-edge marketing automation platform, a company’s efforts were hindered by poor data quality. Despite an innovative solution, the outcome fell short due to inadequate data.

Some attempt to compensate for poor data integration with manual processes, but this approach is fraught with inefficiencies and errors. Manual data enrichment is slow and often neglected, leading to deficient datasets and misleading analytics.

Success in data-driven initiatives hinges on data that is current, correct, consistent, and complete. Without these foundational attributes, even the most advanced technology and skilled personnel cannot salvage the outcomes.

No Plan & Strategy for Ongoing Development

Data and dashboards possess a limited lifespan, requiring a strategic approach to continuously enhance analytics assets.

Numerous factors drive this necessity, including shifts in business dynamics, technology, leadership, and performance metrics.

Common reasons for the abandonment of analytics tools include:

  1. Absence of a development roadmap
  2. Lack of feedback mechanisms for improvement
  3. Failure to claim ownership of BI strategy and assets
  4. Inadequate investment in human resources development
  5. Lack of vision for innovation and growth
  6. Insufficient resources for maintenance and enhancement
  7. Neglect of platform and data integration
  8. Poor user engagement and adoption
  9. Failure to foster a culture of innovation
  10. Complacency and a false sense of achievement

Organizations neglecting ongoing development risk significant setbacks in achieving their analytical objectives.

An effective development plan should encompass:

  1. A clear development roadmap
  2. Established feedback loops for improvement
  3. Defined ownership of BI strategy
  4. Strategic investment in human resources
  5. Vision for innovation and growth
  6. Adequate resources for maintenance
  7. Continuous platform and data integration
  8. Robust user engagement strategies
  9. Cultivation of an innovative culture
  10. A mindset of continuous improvement

Without such measures, analytics projects are prone to failure.

It’s crucial to address these shortcomings and invest in a comprehensive development strategy to avoid wasted insights. 

In summary, organizations must prioritize ongoing development to avoid obsolescence and maximize the value of analytics investments. With a proactive approach and commitment to continual improvement, organizations can ensure that their analytics assets remain effective and aligned with evolving business needs.

We Are Different

We have an outstanding success rate with our projects by avoiding common mistakes that lead to failure

Bespoke Projects

Track global infrastructure development opportunities and CAPEX projects from Million data points in many verticals

Packaged BI

Decrypt company strategies from Million news, company filings, government records and analyst reports

Real Time BI

Monitor brands across online sources, learn what the market really thinks about your products and services

Scroll to Top
Scroll to Top